Candor, zeal, and the substitution of judgement: ethics and the mentally ill criminal defendant.
نویسنده
چکیده
Introduction.........................................................................................208 I. Candor, Zeal, and Confidentiality ............................................215 A. A Brief History of Candor ..................................................215 B. A Brief History of Zeal........................................................219 C. The Obligation to Protect Confidences and Secrets ........224 II. Dusky and Its Discontents: The Law of Competency and Its Limitations.....................................................................226 III. Ethical Guidance in Defending a Mentally Impaired Client ..233 IV. Theory and Practice: Two Real-World Examples ...................245 A. David Sherman ...................................................................246 B. James Murphy .....................................................................252 C. Substitution of Judgment: Reconciling the Choices........255 V. Toward a More Meaningful Ethical Framework......................257 Conclusion ...........................................................................................264
منابع مشابه
Sell v. United States: the appropriate standard for involuntarily administering antipsychotic drugs to dangerous detainees for trial.
INTRODUCTION In Sell v. United States, the United States Supreme Court held that the Constitution allows the government to administer antipsychotic drugs involuntarily to a mentally ill criminal detainee in order to render that defendant competent to stand trial for serious, but nonviolent crimes. Drawing closely from the standards articulated in the earlier cases of Washington v. Harper and Ri...
متن کاملCriminal Law: Commitment and Release of Criminal Defendants Acquitted by Reason of Insanity
WHEN THE DEFENDANT in a criminal case is found not guilty by reason of insanity,' a proper solution to his disposition seeks to satisfy three possibly conflicting considerations. Society demands that dangerous persons be prevented from causing further harm; legal tradition demands that liberty be taken away only by due process of law5 modem scientific knowledge demands that the psychiatric aspe...
متن کاملA New Approach to Insanity Acquittee Recidivism: Redefining the Class of Truly Responsible Recidivists
After receiving verdicts of not guilty by reason of insanity, John McGee and Ronald Manlen were committed to Michigan mental hospitals. The center for forensic psychiatry later determined that McGee and Manlen were “no longer mentally ill and dangerous” and released them. Shortly after being released, McGee kicked his wife to death and Manlen raped two women. The public outcry that followed the...
متن کاملThe criminal defendant with identified mental disorder.
Personal characteristics of criminal defendants including sex,1 age and education,2 and race have been shown to relate to outcome of the defendant's contact with the criminal justice system. Whether mental disorder relates to outcome is uncertain, although there is anecdotal evidence to suggest that in some cases judges may be influenced by a history of mental disorder to acquit the gUilty. 4 W...
متن کاملThe civil liability for damages of the criminally insane.
As a rule, mentally ill patients are held to be responsible for their acts just like everyone else. Notwithstanding, the law in Israel contains special rules which distinguish individuals with mental illness from other people. The instructions laid out in article 34h of the Israeli Penal Law empower the court to release a defendant from criminal responsibility. To do this the following criteria...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The American University law review
دوره 58 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008